EQWL : Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

EQWL is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

EQWL

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

FI Score

56 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EQWL vs DNIOX

11% FI Score
  • dniox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham International Opportunity Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs DWATX

11% FI Score
  • dwatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs ECHCX

11% FI Score
  • echcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs ESACX

11% FI Score
  • esacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Wells Fargo Adjustable Rate Government Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs STIFX

11% FI Score
  • stifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs FNPIX

11% FI Score
  • fnpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs LHCAX

11% FI Score
  • lhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Lord Abbett Health Care Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs HXIAX

11% FI Score
  • hxiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Harvest Asian Bond Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs IERBX

11% FI Score
  • ierbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. International Real Estate Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs IRNIX

11% FI Score
  • irnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Iron Strategic Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs RYAUX

11% FI Score
  • ryaux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Rydex Utilities Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs RYSJX

11% FI Score
  • rysjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Strengthening Dollar 2x Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs RNOTX

11% FI Score
  • rnotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RiverNorth/Oaktree High Income Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs RYELX

11% FI Score
  • ryelx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Electronics Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs RYKIX

11% FI Score
  • rykix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Rydex Banking Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs RYUTX

11% FI Score
  • ryutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Rydex Utilities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs RYZCX

11% FI Score
  • ryzcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Rydex Precious Metals Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs SVARX

11% FI Score
  • svarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Spectrum Low Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs TSGCX

11% FI Score
  • tsgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Timothy Plan Strategic Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EQWL vs UKPIX

11% FI Score
  • ukpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Japan Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo