Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Invesco Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2025 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Putnam Ultra Short Duration Income Fund Class B
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
Aristotle Core Equity Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
iShares Edge High Yield Defensive Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
JPMorgan Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Thrivent High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund
Expenses: 2.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund
Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
iPath Series B Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map