EPP : iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

EPP is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

EPP

iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

FI Score

75 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EPP vs BAEIX

48% FI Score
  • baeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs FEBAX

48% FI Score
  • febax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs OCIO

48% FI Score
  • ocio
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs NWFAX

48% FI Score
  • nwfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs OARLX

48% FI Score
  • oarlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs CMDY

48% FI Score
  • cmdy
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Broad Commodity ETF

Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs SHYL

48% FI Score
  • shyl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs HMVYX

48% FI Score
  • hmvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs NVHCX

48% FI Score
  • nvhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs JMUTX

48% FI Score
  • jmutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Janus Henderson Multi-Sector Income Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs FYC

48% FI Score
  • fyc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs TMAPX

48% FI Score
  • tmapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs NETL

48% FI Score
  • netl
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs MFRBX

48% FI Score
  • mfrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs PYARX

48% FI Score
  • pyarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs PEQNX

48% FI Score
  • peqnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam Equity Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs HFATX

48% FI Score
  • hfatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EPP vs WFEIX

48% FI Score
  • wfeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wells Fargo Enterprise Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo