Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$EMTCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hldcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- embax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hiiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst/SMH High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nhsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pghcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- femhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »