EMLAX : MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund Class A

EMLAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

EMLAX

MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund Class A

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EMLAX vs AWSCX

34% FI Score
  • awscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs FULBX

34% FI Score
  • fulbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Federated Ultrashort Bond Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs AUXFX

34% FI Score
  • auxfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Auxier Focus Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs FTXG

34% FI Score
  • ftxg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs OBCHX

34% FI Score
  • obchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Oberweis China Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs NGCCX

34% FI Score
  • ngccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Columbia Greater China Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs NVGBX

34% FI Score
  • nvgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs SLSDX

34% FI Score
  • slsdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Selected International Fund Class D

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs CBMIX

34% FI Score
  • cbmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Wells Fargo C&B Mid Cap Value Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs HMVAX

34% FI Score
  • hmvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs ARLCX

34% FI Score
  • arlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs CCOR

34% FI Score
  • ccor
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Options-based

Core Alternative ETF

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs SNTKX

34% FI Score
  • sntkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs WSEFX

34% FI Score
  • wsefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Walden Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs TRAMX

34% FI Score
  • tramx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

T. Rowe Price Africa & Middle East Fund

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs WFGGX

34% FI Score
  • wfggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs PTMCX

34% FI Score
  • ptmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

PGIM QMA Large-Cap Core Equity Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs FREEX

34% FI Score
  • freex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Franklin Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EMLAX vs FSNGX

34% FI Score
  • fsngx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Fidelity® Select Natural Gas Portfolio

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo