Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$EMDZX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- vslax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xslcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings U.S. High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jphcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mdhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gscdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- idmix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iM Dolan McEniry Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »