Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$EMBH Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pifzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hllvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Short Duration Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ibdq
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwlix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Low Duration Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bscp
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fjrlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity® Limited Term Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ppvfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Preservation Portfolio Class F-1
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fstyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Short-Term Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- laldx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »