Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$EMB Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ptrbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mggyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phcix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gscdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mdhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xslcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IC
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gszcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »