EISMX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class I

EISMX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with MODERATE fees.

EISMX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class I

FI Score

61 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EISMX vs HIPS

13% FI Score
  • hips
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs OBEMX

13% FI Score
  • obemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Oberweis Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs LBHAX

13% FI Score
  • lbhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs MAEMX

13% FI Score
  • maemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Victory Trivalent Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs MHNAX

13% FI Score
  • mhnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Madison High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs MWSIX

13% FI Score
  • mwsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs PDECX

13% FI Score
  • pdecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund- Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs ACVVX

13% FI Score
  • acvvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 3.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs AEQAX

13% FI Score
  • aeqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ascendant Deep Value Bond Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs AFAAX

13% FI Score
  • afaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs AGFQX

13% FI Score
  • agfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Global Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs AGMAX

13% FI Score
  • agmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI Emerging Markets SRI Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs APJAX

13% FI Score
  • apjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Aberdeen Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs APMAX

13% FI Score
  • apmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs ARMAX

13% FI Score
  • armax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

AllianzGI Global Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs AVSAX

13% FI Score
  • avsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs ORLCX

13% FI Score
  • orlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Square Multi Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs LD

13% FI Score
  • ld
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare EISMX vs CANE

13% FI Score
  • cane
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Teucrium Sugar

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo