Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$EIGMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hancx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- svarx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pcwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tflcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxtcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Diversified Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nhsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Short Duration High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iadex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Diversified Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryhhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Rydex High Yield Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »