Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
We found 11,170 Alternative Leveraged Equities funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Prudential Day One 2055 Fund Class R2
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
American Century International Opportunities Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer International Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Putnam Short Duration Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Ancora/Thelen Small-Mid Cap Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
American Century Emerging Markets Debt Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map