EEMA : iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

EEMA is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

EEMA

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

FI Score

60 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EEMA vs IMSAX

14% FI Score
  • imsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

IMS Dividend Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs EPIBX

14% FI Score
  • epibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

EuroPac International Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs NGINX

14% FI Score
  • nginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs HHCCX

14% FI Score
  • hhccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Highland Healthcare Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs FLRQX

14% FI Score
  • flrqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs HROAX

14% FI Score
  • hroax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Fintrust Income and Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs HTACX

14% FI Score
  • htacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Highland Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs INSCX

14% FI Score
  • inscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs IOCAX

14% FI Score
  • iocax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs LSHAX

14% FI Score
  • lshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo