EEMA : iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

EEMA is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

EEMA

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

FI Score

60 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EEMA vs IPAY

39% FI Score
  • ipay
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs GLVAX

39% FI Score
  • glvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs JHB

39% FI Score
  • jhb
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen High Income November 2021 Target Term Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs JPT

39% FI Score
  • jpt
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Preferred and Income 2022 Term Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs KAUBX

39% FI Score
  • kaubx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated Kaufmann Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs KAUCX

39% FI Score
  • kaucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated Kaufmann Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs LABD

39% FI Score
  • labd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs QGRCX

39% FI Score
  • qgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs QRSVX

39% FI Score
  • qrsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs PXWGX

39% FI Score
  • pxwgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Pax ESG Beta Quality Fund Individual Investor Class

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs RNSC

39% FI Score
  • rnsc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

First Trust Small Cap US Equity Select ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs SBAPX

39% FI Score
  • sbapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Segall Bryant & Hamill Short Term Plus Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs SNOIX

39% FI Score
  • snoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs SWHCX

39% FI Score
  • swhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Principal Strategic Asset Management Strategic Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs STABX

39% FI Score
  • stabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Short Term Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs SXPCX

39% FI Score
  • sxpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS S&P 500 Index Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs TCPAX

39% FI Score
  • tcpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Impact Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs TTRCX

39% FI Score
  • ttrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Templeton Global Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs TYHYX

39% FI Score
  • tyhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs PPVCX

39% FI Score
  • ppvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Funds Preservation Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo