EEMA : iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

EEMA is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with LOW fees.

EEMA

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

FI Score

60 /100

Diversification Rating

5 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EEMA vs GGSCX

40% FI Score
  • ggscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs ACLCX

40% FI Score
  • aclcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century Value Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs DBLEX

40% FI Score
  • dblex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs LMSIX

40% FI Score
  • lmsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

QS U.S. Small Capitalization Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs DGFCX

40% FI Score
  • dgfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Davis Global Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs EAAAX

40% FI Score
  • eaaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Gabelli Enterprise Mergers and Acquisitions Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs EADIX

40% FI Score
  • eadix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs BAPJX

40% FI Score
  • bapjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta 2045 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs EAGIX

40% FI Score
  • eagix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs BAPGX

40% FI Score
  • bapgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta 2035 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs BAPKX

40% FI Score
  • bapkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta 2050 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs KLDW

40% FI Score
  • kldw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Knowledge Leaders Developed World ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs HRLIX

40% FI Score
  • hrlix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs BVEFX

40% FI Score
  • bvefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Becker Value Equity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs BSTSX

40% FI Score
  • bstsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs JVGIX

40% FI Score
  • jvgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs GSHAX

40% FI Score
  • gshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs HAHTX

40% FI Score
  • hahtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford High Yield Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs CULIX

40% FI Score
  • culix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EEMA vs CBBCX

40% FI Score
  • cbbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AB Relative Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo