Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$EEIAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund Investor C shares
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ssiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ssizx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Sierra Tactical Core Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- thyyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Touchstone High Yield Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wsidx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Strategic Income Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwcbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Corporate Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hflcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pmzcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phymx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class M
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »