ECSIX : Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class C

ECSIX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

ECSIX

Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class C

FI Score

31 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECSIX vs PLICX

49% FI Score
  • plicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs INDS

49% FI Score
  • inds
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs PMYAX

49% FI Score
  • pmyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Multi-Cap Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs NCLEX

49% FI Score
  • nclex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nicholas Limited Edition Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs ISEM

49% FI Score
  • isem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco RAFI Strategic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs ITHRX

49% FI Score
  • ithrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

The Hartford Capital Appreciation Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs IXG

49% FI Score
  • ixg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

iShares Global Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs LACAX

49% FI Score
  • lacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Columbia Acorn Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs LCCCX

49% FI Score
  • lcccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Columbia Contrarian Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs LDFVX

49% FI Score
  • ldfvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs LGGAX

49% FI Score
  • lggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

ClearBridge International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs PQIN

49% FI Score
  • pqin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PGIM QMA Strategic Alpha International Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs TLTE

49% FI Score
  • tlte
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index Fund

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs VMMSX

49% FI Score
  • vmmsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs PRRZX

49% FI Score
  • prrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs PSCU

49% FI Score
  • pscu
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs REEAX

49% FI Score
  • reeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

RBC Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs RIPNX

49% FI Score
  • ripnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Royce International Premier Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs RYF

49% FI Score
  • ryf
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECSIX vs SCGVX

49% FI Score
  • scgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Sands Capital Global Growth Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo