• dabax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Delaware Global Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• dag
• ETF
• Commodities
• Focused

DB Agriculture Double Long ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

• dgbp
• ETF
• Money Market
• World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. GBP Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

• efecx
• Mutual Fund
• International Stocks
• Emerging Markets

Ashmore Emerging Markets Frontier Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

• eixax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• emdax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund-Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• fcef
• ETF
• Allocation
• Total World

First Trust CEF Income Opportunity ETF

Expenses: 3.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• gagex
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Energy

Guinness Atkinson Global Energy Fund

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

• himax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Hancock Horizon Mississippi Tax-Free Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• pjeax
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Real Estate

PGIM US Real Estate Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

• pwrax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ryidx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Inverse

Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• prkzx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternatives
• Real Estate

PGIM Real Estate Income Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

• raclx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• rpgix
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

T. Rowe Price Global Industrials Fund

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• ryihx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Inverse

Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• rymnx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Basic Materials

Rydex Precious Metals Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• rympx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Basic Materials

Rydex Precious Metals Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• sbm
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProShares Short Basic Materials

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• scc
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »