ECIBX : Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston Class C

ECIBX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

ECIBX

Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston Class C

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECIBX vs NPNCX

39% FI Score
  • npncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs AEDCX

39% FI Score
  • aedcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Invesco European Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs ALPAX

39% FI Score
  • alpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century Large Company Value Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs PLXGX

39% FI Score
  • plxgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Virtus KAR Capital Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs NCDMX

39% FI Score
  • ncdmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs NGCAX

39% FI Score
  • ngcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Columbia Greater China Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs ARFVX

39% FI Score
  • arfvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs ARSBX

39% FI Score
  • arsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Aristotle Small Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs NRACX

39% FI Score
  • nracx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs NSPIX

39% FI Score
  • nspix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Voya SmallCap Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs ASCZX

39% FI Score
  • asczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Alger Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs ASRAX

39% FI Score
  • asrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs ATWCX

39% FI Score
  • atwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs OGMNX

39% FI Score
  • ogmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs OSVCX

39% FI Score
  • osvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

JPMorgan Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs PABBX

39% FI Score
  • pabbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs TAN

39% FI Score
  • tan
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco Solar ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs BBTGX

39% FI Score
  • bbtgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Sterling Capital Behavioral Large Cap Value Equity Fund A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs PBPAX

39% FI Score
  • pbpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECIBX vs PBW

39% FI Score
  • pbw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo