Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$ECHCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,115 Alternatives Future funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- oaacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Inveso Active Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jsocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- uempx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- pacax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Conservative Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- osicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ousm
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lcgnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- varix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vimcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ocrdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ndvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ndvbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
MFS New Discovery Value Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- odicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Invesco Oppenheimer Discovery Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- oeur
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Europe Stock
O’Shares Europe Quality Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- msacx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- msgfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Franchise Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- olcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term California Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mvgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »