ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Similar Funds

We found 277 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs RMBMX

34% FI Score
  • rmbmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

RMB SMID Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs VKSIX

33% FI Score
  • vksix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSMGX

33% FI Score
  • gsmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PEXL

33% FI Score
  • pexl
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Pacer US Export Leaders ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BFGIX

33% FI Score
  • bfgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CMCCX

33% FI Score
  • cmccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Columbia Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RMDAX

33% FI Score
  • rmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

AllianzGI Mid-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs VALSX

33% FI Score
  • valsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Value Line Select Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HFCSX

33% FI Score
  • hfcsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Hennessy Focus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NWHVX

33% FI Score
  • nwhvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo