ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs ICMBX

17% FI Score
  • icmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Intrepid Capital Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ICOPX

17% FI Score
  • icopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ICTVX

17% FI Score
  • ictvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

ICON Utilities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IIXAX

17% FI Score
  • iixax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LPBCX

17% FI Score
  • lpbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GARBX

17% FI Score
  • garbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IOCZX

17% FI Score
  • ioczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GLLAX

17% FI Score
  • gllax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GNDCX

17% FI Score
  • gndcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs UTPIX

17% FI Score
  • utpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo