ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs WCPIX

14% FI Score
  • wcpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Communication Services UltraSector ProFund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs XVZ

14% FI Score
  • xvz
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

iPath S&P 500 Dynamic VIX ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BOGSX

14% FI Score
  • bogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LQNIX

14% FI Score
  • lqnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

QS Global Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PXRAX

14% FI Score
  • pxrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Virtus Duff & Phelps International Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HANAX

14% FI Score
  • hanax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hanlon Managed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MERKX

14% FI Score
  • merkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Merk Hard Currency Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RYCWX

14% FI Score
  • rycwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Dow 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EAREX

14% FI Score
  • earex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Eaton Vance Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AGCCX

14% FI Score
  • agccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AHDCX

14% FI Score
  • ahdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century High-Yield Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MEAPX

14% FI Score
  • meapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Fixed Income Opportunities Portfolio A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RYILX

14% FI Score
  • ryilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse High Yield Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HNRGX

14% FI Score
  • hnrgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Hennessy BP Energy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ICTEX

14% FI Score
  • ictex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

ICON Information Technology Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NUGCX

14% FI Score
  • nugcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EIM

14% FI Score
  • eim
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NEHCX

14% FI Score
  • nehcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NERCX

14% FI Score
  • nercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NSHCX

14% FI Score
  • nshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo