ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs OKMUX

22% FI Score
  • okmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ORILX

22% FI Score
  • orilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Square Multi Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RDMIX

22% FI Score
  • rdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NWJTX

22% FI Score
  • nwjtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MECEX

22% FI Score
  • mecex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OCMPX

22% FI Score
  • ocmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSMTX

22% FI Score
  • msmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PEMBX

22% FI Score
  • pembx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AFGGX

22% FI Score
  • afggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs APGRX

22% FI Score
  • apgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARGMX

22% FI Score
  • argmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AVACX

22% FI Score
  • avacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HQBCX

22% FI Score
  • hqbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BEECX

22% FI Score
  • beecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BlackRock Total Emerging Markets Fund Investor C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BGIIX

22% FI Score
  • bgiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Brandes Global Equity Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BMPCX

22% FI Score
  • bmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

BlackRock US Mortgage Portfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PDREX

22% FI Score
  • pdrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PFDOX

22% FI Score
  • pfdox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CCBAX

22% FI Score
  • ccbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

City National Rochdale Corporate Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CGAVX

22% FI Score
  • cgavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Causeway Global Absolute Return Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo