ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs TBHDX

28% FI Score
  • tbhdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Tweedy, Browne Worldwide High Dividend Yield Value Fund

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DRGMX

28% FI Score
  • drgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BNY Mellon U.S. Mortgage Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ECEOX

28% FI Score
  • eceox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ECHIX

28% FI Score
  • echix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EEICX

28% FI Score
  • eeicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EMBIX

28% FI Score
  • embix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Blend Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EWV

28% FI Score
  • ewv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FLICX

28% FI Score
  • flicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

DWS Communications Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FDIV

28% FI Score
  • fdiv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

First Trust Strategic Income ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FMF

28% FI Score
  • fmf
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Future

First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FMNCX

28% FI Score
  • fmncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal High Yield Advantage Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FNYFX

28% FI Score
  • fnyfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Delaware Tax-Free New York II Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WFEFX

28% FI Score
  • wfefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Wells Fargo International Equity Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GIJPX

28% FI Score
  • gijpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSCCX

28% FI Score
  • gsccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HFHAX

28% FI Score
  • hfhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HFHSX

28% FI Score
  • hfhsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PJRAX

28% FI Score
  • pjrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MGVCX

28% FI Score
  • mgvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Infrastructure Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IZIAX

28% FI Score
  • iziax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco International Select Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo