ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs MGGYX

29% FI Score
  • mggyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IIRFX

29% FI Score
  • iirfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Voya Russia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TLDAX

29% FI Score
  • tldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTADX

29% FI Score
  • gtadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2025 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SBB

29% FI Score
  • sbb
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short SmallCap600

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NCEAX

29% FI Score
  • nceax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Neuberger Berman Greater China Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FSGIX

29% FI Score
  • fsgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 1-3 Years Service Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NIMAX

29% FI Score
  • nimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DLHAX

29% FI Score
  • dlhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Delaware Healthcare Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NMDMX

29% FI Score
  • nmdmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NMHAX

29% FI Score
  • nmhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SCIF

29% FI Score
  • scif
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

VanEck Vectors India Small-Cap Index ETF

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LFECX

29% FI Score
  • lfecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2035 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTCBX

29% FI Score
  • mtcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTCCX

29% FI Score
  • mtccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

MFS Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LTTCX

29% FI Score
  • lttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IIXIX

29% FI Score
  • iixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WGBFX

29% FI Score
  • wgbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PCHSX

29% FI Score
  • pchsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Putnam Global Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SSIFX

29% FI Score
  • ssifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Sextant International Fund

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo