ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs EDICX

29% FI Score
  • edicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EMKCX

29% FI Score
  • emkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EMVCX

29% FI Score
  • emvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Innovators Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WWOCX

29% FI Score
  • wwocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EUGAX

29% FI Score
  • eugax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc. Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EWEAX

29% FI Score
  • eweax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FIXRX

29% FI Score
  • fixrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FNGD

29% FI Score
  • fngd
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

MicroSectors FANG+ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FPXE

29% FI Score
  • fpxe
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FSAHX

29% FI Score
  • fsahx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Fidelity® Short Duration High Income Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FTGC

29% FI Score
  • ftgc
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FXC

29% FI Score
  • fxc
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • Single Currency

Invesco CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar Trust

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Single Currency Money Market fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SIRCX

29% FI Score
  • sircx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sierra Tactical All Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GESIX

29% FI Score
  • gesix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Equity Select Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTAMX

29% FI Score
  • gtamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2040 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTAQX

29% FI Score
  • gtaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2045 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GUTEX

29% FI Score
  • gutex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Victory Tax-Exempt Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HFKCX

29% FI Score
  • hfkcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HHDAX

29% FI Score
  • hhdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Hancock Horizon Diversified International Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HMJCX

29% FI Score
  • hmjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo