ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs AIHAX

30% FI Score
  • aihax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Horizon Active Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AIQ

30% FI Score
  • aiq
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Global X Future Analytics Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs APFDX

30% FI Score
  • apfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Discovery Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AREMX

30% FI Score
  • aremx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2055 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARFDX

30% FI Score
  • arfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARSSX

30% FI Score
  • arssx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aristotle Strategic Credit Fund

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AWTCX

30% FI Score
  • awtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

AllianzGI Water Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PAK

30% FI Score
  • pak
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Global X MSCI Pakistan ETF

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BCAPX

30% FI Score
  • bcapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LGOV

30% FI Score
  • lgov
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

First Trust Long Duration Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LTTBX

30% FI Score
  • lttbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund Class B

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LEGR

30% FI Score
  • legr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LAGIX

30% FI Score
  • lagix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Ladenburg Aggressive Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BIREX

30% FI Score
  • birex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

BlackRock Real Estate Securities Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PHYLX

30% FI Score
  • phylx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BRCCX

30% FI Score
  • brccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PELCX

30% FI Score
  • pelcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs QMNIX

30% FI Score
  • qmnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CAXIX

30% FI Score
  • caxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CCSCX

30% FI Score
  • ccscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo