ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs FGILX

31% FI Score
  • fgilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Fidelity® Global Equity Income Fund

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AEDVX

31% FI Score
  • aedvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Emerging Markets Debt Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CFIPX

31% FI Score
  • cfipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

QS Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OBOR

31% FI Score
  • obor
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GGGAX

31% FI Score
  • gggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LROAX

31% FI Score
  • lroax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GDG

31% FI Score
  • gdg
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Gadsden Dynamic Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ECSIX

31% FI Score
  • ecsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BJK

31% FI Score
  • bjk
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PSFIX

31% FI Score
  • psfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PUDAX

31% FI Score
  • pudax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BWVAX

31% FI Score
  • bwvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital West Virginia Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MGBAX

31% FI Score
  • mgbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ECEMX

31% FI Score
  • ecemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Parametric Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TGPNX

31% FI Score
  • tgpnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

TCW Conservative Allocation Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MMUBX

31% FI Score
  • mmubx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

MFS Utilities Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MMUCX

31% FI Score
  • mmucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

MFS Utilities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MRLBX

31% FI Score
  • mrlbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Real Estate Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LTUSX

31% FI Score
  • ltusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TGMEX

31% FI Score
  • tgmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

TCW Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Opportunities Fund N Share Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo