ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs VCRAX

31% FI Score
  • vcrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

MainStay CBRE Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs VGISX

31% FI Score
  • vgisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WBLIX

31% FI Score
  • wblix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

William Blair Low Duration Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WELNX

31% FI Score
  • welnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WFDFX

31% FI Score
  • wfdfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2060 Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JINCX

31% FI Score
  • jincx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Unconstrained Debt Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HAFCX

31% FI Score
  • hafcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HDGE

31% FI Score
  • hdge
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF

Expenses: 3.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NMHYX

31% FI Score
  • nmhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Northern Multi-Manager High Yield Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HGXAX

31% FI Score
  • hgxax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Impact Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JVICX

31% FI Score
  • jvicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Virtus Vontobel Foreign Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ONYCX

31% FI Score
  • onycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester AMT-Free New York Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PAXHX

31% FI Score
  • paxhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pax High Yield Bond Fund Individual Investor Class

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MAEFX

31% FI Score
  • maefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

BlackRock EuroFund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MYITX

31% FI Score
  • myitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

MainStay MacKay International Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MYIIX

31% FI Score
  • myiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

MainStay MacKay International Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NCOAX

31% FI Score
  • ncoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Symphony High Yield Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ABNAX

31% FI Score
  • abnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

AB Bond Inflation Strategy Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AGQ

31% FI Score
  • agq
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ProShares Ultra Silver

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AOBLX

31% FI Score
  • aoblx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo