ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs OCAIX

35% FI Score
  • ocaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Select Risk: High Growth Investor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MBGVX

35% FI Score
  • mbgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AMG GW&K Core Bond ESG Fund - Class N

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MFDAX

35% FI Score
  • mfdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AMG GW&K Enhanced Core Bond ESG Fund - Class N

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MIACX

35% FI Score
  • miacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OGUCX

35% FI Score
  • ogucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PCUFX

35% FI Score
  • pcufx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

PGIM Jennison Utility Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MWISX

35% FI Score
  • mwisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MXDE

35% FI Score
  • mxde
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Nationwide Maximum Diversification Emerging Markets Core Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AEHDX

35% FI Score
  • aehdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Emerging Markets Debt Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AMHYX

35% FI Score
  • amhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ANHIX

35% FI Score
  • anhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AOTAX

35% FI Score
  • aotax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARANX

35% FI Score
  • aranx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARDMX

35% FI Score
  • ardmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2040 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARGNX

35% FI Score
  • argnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio I Class

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARKQ

35% FI Score
  • arkq
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARWCX

35% FI Score
  • arwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2025 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AUNCX

35% FI Score
  • auncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AWTAX

35% FI Score
  • awtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

AllianzGI Water Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BCGPX

35% FI Score
  • bcgpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo