ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs FCFRX

35% FI Score
  • fcfrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FIRNX

35% FI Score
  • firnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Simplicity RMD Income Fund

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FLEU

35% FI Score
  • fleu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Barclays ETN+ FI Enhanced Europe 50 ETN Series B

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FPIVX

35% FI Score
  • fpivx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

FPA International Value Fund

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FXZ

35% FI Score
  • fxz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

First Trust Materials AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FYHTX

35% FI Score
  • fyhtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Fidelity® Commodity Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GERCX

35% FI Score
  • gercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GDMIX

35% FI Score
  • gdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GGHCX

35% FI Score
  • gghcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Invesco Health Care Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GIYAX

35% FI Score
  • giyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSDAX

35% FI Score
  • gsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HAUD

35% FI Score
  • haud
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Australia ETF

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HEWW

35% FI Score
  • heww
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Mexico ETF

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HGHYX

35% FI Score
  • hghyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

The Hartford Healthcare Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HRLSX

35% FI Score
  • hrlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HYINX

35% FI Score
  • hyinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HYSCX

35% FI Score
  • hyscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IAPOX

35% FI Score
  • iapox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ivy Apollo Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JDST

35% FI Score
  • jdst
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs KOL

35% FI Score
  • kol
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

VanEck Vectors Coal ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo