ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs THOCX

36% FI Score
  • thocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PZRMX

36% FI Score
  • pzrmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs KGDIX

36% FI Score
  • kgdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS Global Small Cap Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTUKX

36% FI Score
  • mtukx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2045 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NSVCX

36% FI Score
  • nsvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JOECX

36% FI Score
  • joecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

JPMorgan Opportunistic Equity Long/Short Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SDICX

36% FI Score
  • sdicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Guggenheim Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTYKX

36% FI Score
  • mtykx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2050 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTMCX

36% FI Score
  • mtmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LSFAX

36% FI Score
  • lsfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LSGLX

36% FI Score
  • lsglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JMBAX

36% FI Score
  • jmbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

John Hancock Funds Short Duration Credit Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HEWU

36% FI Score
  • hewu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI United Kingdom ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HFHIX

36% FI Score
  • hfhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NSMUX

36% FI Score
  • nsmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Short Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TWEBX

36% FI Score
  • twebx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Tweedy, Browne Value Fund

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HIPAX

36% FI Score
  • hipax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NWJSX

36% FI Score
  • nwjsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JHYMX

35% FI Score
  • jhymx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BNCAX

35% FI Score
  • bncax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo