ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs JPED

37% FI Score
  • jped
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Short

JPMorgan Event Driven ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NBRFX

37% FI Score
  • nbrfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FTGTX

37% FI Score
  • ftgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GGM

37% FI Score
  • ggm
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Credit Allocation Fund

Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GCGGX

37% FI Score
  • gcggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

DWS GNMA Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OGMCX

37% FI Score
  • ogmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PBRIX

37% FI Score
  • pbrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PBTRX

37% FI Score
  • pbtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class B

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JPC

37% FI Score
  • jpc
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GILFX

37% FI Score
  • gilfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ASUAX

37% FI Score
  • asuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AllianzGI Global Sustainability Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ACP

37% FI Score
  • acp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aberdeen Income Credit Strategies Fund

Expenses: 3.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HYLS

37% FI Score
  • hyls
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MAICX

37% FI Score
  • maicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory Trivalent International Fund-Core Equity Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IGEIX

37% FI Score
  • igeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AGREX

37% FI Score
  • agrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Invesco Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HTEC

37% FI Score
  • htec
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Robo Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BEDIX

37% FI Score
  • bedix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Emerging Markets Flexible Dynamic Bond Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CCKTX

37% FI Score
  • ccktx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Funds 2060 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MDHAX

37% FI Score
  • mdhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo