ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs PRDCX

42% FI Score
  • prdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DISCX

42% FI Score
  • discx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

BNY Mellon International Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FXR

42% FI Score
  • fxr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FBMCX

42% FI Score
  • fbmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin Managed Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PRHCX

42% FI Score
  • prhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM High Yield Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RINF

42% FI Score
  • rinf
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PTLCX

42% FI Score
  • ptlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BINIX

42% FI Score
  • binix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Baron International Growth Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RNDM

42% FI Score
  • rndm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Trust Developed International Equity Select ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PIFCX

42% FI Score
  • pifcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JSACX

42% FI Score
  • jsacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2045 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TEQAX

42% FI Score
  • teqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JARIX

42% FI Score
  • jarix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

James Alpha Global Real Estate Investments Portfolio Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HNCTX

42% FI Score
  • hnctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Hartford International Growth Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs VTAIX

42% FI Score
  • vtaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FLBL

42% FI Score
  • flbl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARDVX

42% FI Score
  • ardvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2040 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CID

42% FI Score
  • cid
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

VictoryShares International High Div Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AZTFX

42% FI Score
  • aztfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Trust of Arizona Class A

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GLV

42% FI Score
  • glv
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund

Expenses: 3.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo