ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs PIPCX

42% FI Score
  • pipcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class C

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JAHYX

42% FI Score
  • jahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Janus Henderson High-Yield Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JCAFX

42% FI Score
  • jcafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

John Hancock California Tax Free Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JSRCX

42% FI Score
  • jsrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

JPMorgan SmartRetirement® Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LANYX

42% FI Score
  • lanyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Lord Abbett New York Tax Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LFMIX

42% FI Score
  • lfmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

LoCorr Macro Strategies Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LHIAX

42% FI Score
  • lhiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GEMAX

42% FI Score
  • gemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RINF

42% FI Score
  • rinf
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RLLCX

42% FI Score
  • rllcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ryan Labs Long Credit Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RNDM

42% FI Score
  • rndm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Trust Developed International Equity Select ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RSGGX

42% FI Score
  • rsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Victory RS Global Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SDAG

42% FI Score
  • sdag
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

IQ Short Duration Enhanced Core Bond U.S. ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SMAMX

42% FI Score
  • smamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SMTRX

42% FI Score
  • smtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs STHRX

42% FI Score
  • sthrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2030 Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SZIAX

42% FI Score
  • sziax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

DWS Total Return Bond Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TEMGX

42% FI Score
  • temgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs THOAX

42% FI Score
  • thoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TWIEX

42% FI Score
  • twiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo