ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs JPMB

46% FI Score
  • jpmb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GANYX

46% FI Score
  • ganyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class V

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs POSAX

46% FI Score
  • posax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EIFHX

45% FI Score
  • eifhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FSUTX

45% FI Score
  • fsutx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Fidelity® Select Utilities Portfolio

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PXEAX

45% FI Score
  • pxeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Pax Global Environmental Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ODVCX

45% FI Score
  • odvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARBVX

45% FI Score
  • arbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2020 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NVCCX

45% FI Score
  • nvccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DPCFX

45% FI Score
  • dpcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Delaware Diversified Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EGINX

45% FI Score
  • eginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Invesco European Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ALTFX

45% FI Score
  • altfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSGAX

45% FI Score
  • gsgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTRBX

45% FI Score
  • mtrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Total Return Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FIUIX

45% FI Score
  • fiuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Fidelity® Telecom and Utilities Fund

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CCDTX

45% FI Score
  • ccdtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARBFX

45% FI Score
  • arbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

The Arbitrage Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EIAMX

45% FI Score
  • eiamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JCUAX

45% FI Score
  • jcuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Money Market
  • World

John Hancock Funds Absolute Return Currency Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCDFX

45% FI Score
  • mcdfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Matthews China Dividend Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo