EBSAX : Equinox Campbell Strategy Fund Class A

EBSAX is a Alternatives Market Future with HIGH fees.

EBSAX

Equinox Campbell Strategy Fund Class A

FI Score

24 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Future funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EBSAX vs MCCGX

32% FI Score
  • mccgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Great Consumer Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs BKITX

32% FI Score
  • bkitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital Kentucky Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs BIFIX

32% FI Score
  • bifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

William Blair Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs APINX

32% FI Score
  • apinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AMG Managers Pictet International Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs CCAFX

32% FI Score
  • ccafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Calvert Mid-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs CPUAX

32% FI Score
  • cpuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AAM/Insight Select Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs MLTCX

32% FI Score
  • mltcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs MWOCX

32% FI Score
  • mwocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs APPLX

32% FI Score
  • applx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Appleseed Fund Investor Share

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs ROGSX

32% FI Score
  • rogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Red Oak Technology Select Fund

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs JJE

32% FI Score
  • jje
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Energy Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs GEADX

32% FI Score
  • geadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Goldman Sachs Enhanced Income Fund Class Administration

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs DFVS

32% FI Score
  • dfvs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

iPath US Treasury 5-year Bear ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs TGWIX

32% FI Score
  • tgwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

TCW Emerging Markets Local Currency Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs ATTCX

32% FI Score
  • attcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice In Retirement Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs RDCCX

32% FI Score
  • rdccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Disciplined Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs NMUCX

32% FI Score
  • nmucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs LSGGX

32% FI Score
  • lsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs TMUIX

32% FI Score
  • tmuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Transamerica Global Equity Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EBSAX vs ICDAX

32% FI Score
  • icdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Ivy Pzena International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo