Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$EBIZ Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Consumer Cyclicals funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- irnix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Iron Strategic Income Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stifx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rysjx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Strengthening Dollar 2x Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rnotx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
RiverNorth/Oaktree High Income Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryvvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- spmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sscpx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- svarx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tsgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Timothy Plan Strategic Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »