Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$EAGMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mdhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cubax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jphcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vslax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- amapx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Amana Participation Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hfhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- zeoix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Zeo Short Duration Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eeicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »