Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$EAFGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fbgx
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- aaagx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mrlsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pjfbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund- Class B
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- legcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rpeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Davis Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- plaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PACE Large Co Growth Equity Investments Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- klccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Federated Kaufmann Large Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lcgnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »