EAAMX : Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund Class A

EAAMX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market with HIGH fees.

EAAMX

Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund Class A

FI Score

34 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EAAMX vs YAFFX

46% FI Score
  • yaffx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AMG Yacktman Focused Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs JIAIX

46% FI Score
  • jiaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multi-Asset High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs BGAFX

46% FI Score
  • bgafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Baron Global Advantage Fund Retail Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs PGEOX

46% FI Score
  • pgeox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

George Putnam Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs PEUCX

46% FI Score
  • peucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Principal Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs BUFTX

46% FI Score
  • buftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Buffalo Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs CSMZX

46% FI Score
  • csmzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs QIVAX

46% FI Score
  • qivax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs CAPFX

46% FI Score
  • capfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated Capital Income Fund Class F Shares

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs TAPR

46% FI Score
  • tapr
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Barclays Inverse US Treasury Aggregate ETN

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs CEE

46% FI Score
  • cee
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

The Central and Eastern Europe Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs WIL

46% FI Score
  • wil
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Barclays Women in Leadership ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs POSAX

46% FI Score
  • posax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Principal Global Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs PPSC

46% FI Score
  • ppsc
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus S&P Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs RLTAX

46% FI Score
  • rltax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class Investor

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs CHIX

46% FI Score
  • chix
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Financials ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs QASCX

46% FI Score
  • qascx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Federated MDT Small Cap Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs CNXT

46% FI Score
  • cnxt
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs PXTNX

46% FI Score
  • pxtnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PIMCO RAE PLUS Fund Class I-3

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EAAMX vs CSB

46% FI Score
  • csb
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

VictoryShares US Small Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo