Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$DXSLX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,170 Alternative Leveraged Equities funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tlvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hfmtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jmin
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- odvix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Invesco Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund Class R6
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- jvltx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund Class I2
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lceax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Invesco Diversified Dividend Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hbaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Moderate Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hfmix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
The Hartford MidCap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hgoyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
The Hartford Growth Opportunities Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jaenx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ihoix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford International Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- ihotx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford International Opportunities Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- iyt
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Industrials
iShares Transportation Average ETF
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jafix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Janus Henderson Flexible Bond Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- jhmd
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- lbndx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- lisix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Lazard International Strategic Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- psch
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »