Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$DUICX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ibmm
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sumax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
SEI Tax Exempt Trust Short Duration Municipal Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- utelx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
USAA Tax Exempt Long-Term Fund Adviser Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nvhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhyqx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin High Yield Tax Free Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mfiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MFS Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
T. Rowe Price California Tax-Free Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- coltx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Tax-Exempt Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tecfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
American Funds Tax-Exempt Fund of California® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »