Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$DTLVX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hvorx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Hartford Quality Value Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- gsvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lyrbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Lyrical U.S. Value Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lmbjx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
BrandywineGLOBAL - Dynamic US Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hnddx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Horizon Active Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hcmnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- cvcfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- peicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM Jennison Value Fund- Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- nngcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nuveen Large-Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »