Diversification Rating
10 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$DRW Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tscsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cabdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AB Relative Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fhaix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Franklin High Income Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bmbyx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BMO Moderate Allocation Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- qsy
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Shareholder Yield Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- aemsx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Institutional Service Class
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- rmiix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
RiverFront Asset Allocation Moderate Class I
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pghy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tqtix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
AMG TimesSquare International Small Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- padzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nhmax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- adfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
American Century Diversified Bond Fund A Class
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- jmtax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan Total Return Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- umbmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gtlox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ihoax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford International Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- eaasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ihosx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
The Hartford International Opportunities Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »