Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$DRLAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lmeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
QS Conservative Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bci
- ETF
- Commodities
- Broad
Aberdeen Standard Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- ombax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- trrux
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- ptbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Principal LifeTime 2020 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- rwj
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sgiix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
First Eagle Global Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jvlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hdvvx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Hartford International Equity Fund Class R6
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- omeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
JPMorgan Market Expansion Enhanced Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lisax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Lord Abbett Intermediate Tax Free Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- focsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Fidelity® Small Cap Growth K6 Fund
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- apgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hbaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Moderate Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- isfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- gsy
- ETF
- Alternative
- Short
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- usdu
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
WisdomTree Bloomberg U.S. Dollar Bullish Fund
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- dsenx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
DoubleLine Shiller Enhanced CAPE® Class N
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fcamx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Class A1
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »