Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$DMECX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 310 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- qsslx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AQR TM Small Cap Multi-Style Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sqlv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Legg Mason Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- scuix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- cdofx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ninax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sssix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG SouthernSun Small Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- arsvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jscax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
John Hancock II Small Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wmmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »