Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
4 /10
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
BMO Short Tax-Free Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Franklin Federal Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map