DIBAX : BNY Mellon International Bond Fund Class A

DIBAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

DIBAX

BNY Mellon International Bond Fund Class A

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare DIBAX vs RWVG

44% FI Score
  • rwvg
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Direxion Russell 1000 Value Over Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs RXL

44% FI Score
  • rxl
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Health Care

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs RYUHX

44% FI Score
  • ryuhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs SBCPX

44% FI Score
  • sbcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

QS Defensive Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs SCBPX

44% FI Score
  • scbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Principal Strategic Asset Management Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs SCIX

44% FI Score
  • scix
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Global X Scientific Beta Asia ex-Japan ETF

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs SUVZX

44% FI Score
  • suvzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM QMA Large-Cap Value Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs SYE

44% FI Score
  • sye
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

SPDR MFS Systematic Core Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs SWSCX

44% FI Score
  • swscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Schwab Small-Cap Equity Fund™

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DIBAX vs TADAX

44% FI Score
  • tadax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Transamerica US Growth Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo