Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
1 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
ProFunds Rising Rates Opportunity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
Guggenheim Series Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
Virtus Newfleet Core Plus Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Segall Bryant & Hamill Emerging Markets Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Thornburg New York Intermediate Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map